2 hours ago
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
The hiatus is almost over
This time the excuse is that Mr. Mouse and I had to go back east to upstate New York to visit family and attend the wedding of a very dear friend. I did make it about halfway through The Girl Who Played with Fire, so a review of that will be up here eventually. It took us fifteen hours to get back home yesterday, mostly due to horrific layovers; we spent some time in airport bars and discovered what may be our new favorite show: Restaurant Impossible. It's not something that will turn up here ever really, but it was still fun: "Your food is crap! The service is crap! Do you want me to help you or what?" Heh. Meanwhile, I absolutely positively promise to get a Sarah Connor recap up here this week. It's like ripping off a Band-aid: I keep putting it off and putting it off, but if I just friggin' do it, it'll all be fine.
Saturday, May 26, 2012
Next up
Omigosh, it's just too much. I have the second season of Dollhouse to get through; I'm rereading The Heroes which is even more super-fun now that I know who some of the characters are; a coworker loaned me Series 1 of Sherlock which I'm wicked excited about; and I'm poised to start recapping the final season of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, so you can stop nagging me about that one, Joe. Soon, I promise, it's all coming soon. As should be S4 of True Blood - when the hell's that coming out?
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Thoughts on The Avengers
Marvel's The Avengers. I finally saw it, at a well-attended but not packed 3:00 p.m. matinee. I liked it quite a lot. It seemed a little frantic in spots in the third act when all action broke loose, but it was funny and well-assembled, with great character moments. I don't have anything to say that hasn't been said on the interwebs a million times before, but here are just some random thoughtlets:
- Joss Whedon is, has been, and will always be my master.
- I loved the giant, floating, armored space moray eels!
- Always nice to see some Whedonverse alums getting screen time: Enver Gjokaj (from Dollhouse), Ashley Johnson (from two S1 episodes of Dollhouse) and Alexis Denisof (apparently he was one of the alien dudes in the movie, but we all know him from Buffy, Angel and Dollhouse).
- I'm thinking of going on Kickstarter to raise money to get Jeremy Renner and Mark Ruffalo to do a pillow fight. How much you think it'll take?
- Mmmmmmmm - Jeremy Renner and Mark Ruffalo in a pillow fight ...
Saturday, May 19, 2012
Movie review: Drive
About friggin' time some new content went up here ...
In last year's Drive, Ryan Gosling plays The Driver, a quiet Los Angeles loner who works as a mechanic in his full-time job, does stunt driving for the movies part-time and takes jobs as the world's best getaway driver on the side. He keeps to himself, focusing on whatever job is at hand - calm to the point of comatose, disconnected from the people around him, except as much as his twitchy boss/manager Shannon (Bryan Cranston) can get him to engage. When he moves into a new apartment, he meets his neighbors, Irene (Carey Mulligan) and her son, Benecio. He likes them, and they him, and they spend some time together, the long silent pauses only slightly uncomfortable. Soon enough Irene's husband Standard gets out of jail. There's some initial tension when the ex-con is suspicious of this new guy moving in on his family, but when some old prison buddies lean on Standard for money he owes them, The Driver steps up to help and keep Irene and little Benecio safe. Things go south, badly, and The Driver is soon enmeshed in complications, including threats from local gangsters played to type by Ron Perlman and against type by Albert Brooks.
This is a fantastic movie. It's paced fairly slowly, with the tension ratcheting up almost imperceptibly until I realized I was leaning forward in my seat, shoulders tensed up around my ears. There are moments of extreme violence but they are spaced out and all the more potent for their rarity. The story is tight, there is no superfluous dialogue. And the acting is superb. Albert Brooks chews the scenery a tad, but his charming menace is believable. Bryan Cranston is good and about as far from Walter White (Breaking Bad) as possible. Ryan Gosling is just fantastic: a man without name, without history, with only slight bursts of action, he delicately marks his character's progression with subtle expression and tension. He's on-screen a lot but he doesn't say much, and yet he's just wonderful.
A lot of things I read thought Drive should have been up for best picture, especially since they made the nominee field larger last year. I can see why some people wouldn't have wanted it nominated - it's not a big, splashy movie, and technically it's an action/thriller which genre doesn't too often get to the big show - but gosh, the story and acting are good enough that I too think maybe it should have been in the running. For an "action" flick, it's pretty slow-paced for the most part (I watched it without Mr. Mouse but know he would have deemed it too slow) and quite frankly for a movie about a driver I would have liked at least one more car chase, particularly since the one big one was so good. But it's really the outstanding acting that makes Drive so good - even makes you forget Ryan Gosling was ever in that stupid Notebook.
In last year's Drive, Ryan Gosling plays The Driver, a quiet Los Angeles loner who works as a mechanic in his full-time job, does stunt driving for the movies part-time and takes jobs as the world's best getaway driver on the side. He keeps to himself, focusing on whatever job is at hand - calm to the point of comatose, disconnected from the people around him, except as much as his twitchy boss/manager Shannon (Bryan Cranston) can get him to engage. When he moves into a new apartment, he meets his neighbors, Irene (Carey Mulligan) and her son, Benecio. He likes them, and they him, and they spend some time together, the long silent pauses only slightly uncomfortable. Soon enough Irene's husband Standard gets out of jail. There's some initial tension when the ex-con is suspicious of this new guy moving in on his family, but when some old prison buddies lean on Standard for money he owes them, The Driver steps up to help and keep Irene and little Benecio safe. Things go south, badly, and The Driver is soon enmeshed in complications, including threats from local gangsters played to type by Ron Perlman and against type by Albert Brooks.
This is a fantastic movie. It's paced fairly slowly, with the tension ratcheting up almost imperceptibly until I realized I was leaning forward in my seat, shoulders tensed up around my ears. There are moments of extreme violence but they are spaced out and all the more potent for their rarity. The story is tight, there is no superfluous dialogue. And the acting is superb. Albert Brooks chews the scenery a tad, but his charming menace is believable. Bryan Cranston is good and about as far from Walter White (Breaking Bad) as possible. Ryan Gosling is just fantastic: a man without name, without history, with only slight bursts of action, he delicately marks his character's progression with subtle expression and tension. He's on-screen a lot but he doesn't say much, and yet he's just wonderful.
A lot of things I read thought Drive should have been up for best picture, especially since they made the nominee field larger last year. I can see why some people wouldn't have wanted it nominated - it's not a big, splashy movie, and technically it's an action/thriller which genre doesn't too often get to the big show - but gosh, the story and acting are good enough that I too think maybe it should have been in the running. For an "action" flick, it's pretty slow-paced for the most part (I watched it without Mr. Mouse but know he would have deemed it too slow) and quite frankly for a movie about a driver I would have liked at least one more car chase, particularly since the one big one was so good. But it's really the outstanding acting that makes Drive so good - even makes you forget Ryan Gosling was ever in that stupid Notebook.
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Well, now I've done it
I've finished Joe Abercrombie's First Law trilogy, the final book being Last Argument of Kings. And now I have to go back and read Best Served Cold and The Heroes, in the proper order, now that I know more of the characters. You don't have to have read the trilogy first but having done so will provide a richer understanding of this world Abercrombie has created. And since I love this world so much, I want to go back and get everything I can out of it.
I think what Abercrombie does so well - aside from the dark humor and the incredibly written fight/battle scenes - is circle around to minor characters, plot points and loose ends, and tie everything together or call-back to it. I would love to know whether these five books were painstakingly diagrammed out before he wrote them or if he's just very skilled at remembering everything that's happened. A friend of mine who is also a huge Abercrombie fan told me that there's a new book coming out this fall, Red Country. Here's the description:
I think what Abercrombie does so well - aside from the dark humor and the incredibly written fight/battle scenes - is circle around to minor characters, plot points and loose ends, and tie everything together or call-back to it. I would love to know whether these five books were painstakingly diagrammed out before he wrote them or if he's just very skilled at remembering everything that's happened. A friend of mine who is also a huge Abercrombie fan told me that there's a new book coming out this fall, Red Country. Here's the description:
Shy South comes home to her farm to find a blackened shell, her brother and sister stolen, and knows she'll have to go back to bad old ways if she's ever to see them again. She sets off in pursuit with only her cowardly old step-father Lamb for company. But it turns out he's hiding a bloody past of his own. None bloodier.Read that bit again about her "cowardly old step-father" - that could be Logen Ninefingers, couldn't it? Seeing how the last we heard of him was SPOILER him diving out the window and running away from being King of the North END SPOILER. That would be fine by me - I like the ol' Bloody-nine.
Their journey will take them across the lawless plains, to a frontier town gripped by gold fever, through feuds, duels, and massacres, high into unmapped mountains to a reckoning with ancient enemies, and force them into alliance with Nicomo Cosca, infamous soldier of fortune, a man no one should ever have to trust . . .
Labels:
books,
fantasy,
fiction,
Joe Abercrombie
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Mini movie review: Super 8
When Super 8 came out in the theaters, I can remember how excited all the fan-boys were. A J.J. Abrams movie homage to the good Spielberg movies! Ooh! Squee! So exciting to have a science fiction/alien movie the way they used to be done. Well, I just watched Super 8 on DVD and I'm not so sure what all the hullaballoo was about - I was fairly unimpressed. I thought the CGI came off very poorly, although maybe it was better on a movie screen (altho' my television screen has translated other CGI-heavy flicks with no ill effects). I liked the cast - Elle Fanning was really good and it's always nice to see Kyle Chandler getting work - but at least two of the boys got completely lost along the way ... unlike The Goonies, which managed to keep the audience engaged with its entire ensemble the whole way through. And I thought the story was kind of lame: alien ripping apart a town, killing people and smashing things into mayhem, then three seconds of face time with our young hero and the alien (1) has suddenly fixed his ship and (2) leaves without further ado/mayhem. Bollocks, I say. I felt short-changed - unlike, say, Cloverfield, which wasn't the most original ending but at least felt like an ending. Super 8 just sort of stops short. I sure did like the kids' finished zombie movie, though.
Labels:
movies,
reviews,
science fiction,
why did I watch that?
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Nominal update
Sorry things have been so light around here. But we just finished up the ski season last weekend so that means summer is just around the corner ... and I promised my old friend Joe B. that I would get back to recapping Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles once the seasons turned - it just seems like a summertime show to me. So, Joe, if you're reading this, I have moved T:TSCC back up to the top of the list. (Of course, I have to watch Tucker and Dale vs. Evil again first because Mr. Mouse wants to see it. You could have knocked me over with a feather when he said he wanted to see that movie.)
Also, I recently finished the second book in The First Law trilogy by Joe Abercrombie, Before They Are Hanged. These books are getting better and better as they go, as Abercrombie finds his voice and hones his craft. It's funny, having read his books in reverse order, because this trilogy is much more of a fantasy high fantasy novel, whereas the magnificent The Heroes is very strongly a battle fantasy high fantasy novel, with very little magicky elements. The battle focus was what I was expecting and the more fantastical elements of the trilogy were a bit of a surprise. I've just started the last book in the trilogy and am so pleased that it seems to be the longest of the bunch. That just means there's more of it to read - yay!
Also, I recently finished the second book in The First Law trilogy by Joe Abercrombie, Before They Are Hanged. These books are getting better and better as they go, as Abercrombie finds his voice and hones his craft. It's funny, having read his books in reverse order, because this trilogy is much more of a fantasy high fantasy novel, whereas the magnificent The Heroes is very strongly a battle fantasy high fantasy novel, with very little magicky elements. The battle focus was what I was expecting and the more fantastical elements of the trilogy were a bit of a surprise. I've just started the last book in the trilogy and am so pleased that it seems to be the longest of the bunch. That just means there's more of it to read - yay!
Labels:
books,
fantasy,
fiction,
Joe Abercrombie,
Sarah Connor Chronicles,
t.v. shows
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Movie review: Super
James Gunn's Super is one weird little film which, granted, I knew going in, but even so surprised me. I don't know a lot about Gunn's previous work aside from Slither (which I adore) but I knew from reading reviews that Super was supposed to be dark, twisted, funny and violent which seem to be the director's typical M.O. I had thought that maybe Mr. Mouse might like this film - he like dark comedies and he likes Rainn Wilson - but as I started watching it one night after Mr. Mouse had already gone to bed, I knew within minutes that I'd made the right call to watch it without him.
Super is the story of sad-sack Frank (Wilson) who, after his recovering addict wife (Liv Tyler) leaves him for a handsome, smarmy drug dealer Jock (Kevin Bacon - excellent and clearly enjoying himself), adopts a superhero alter-ego, The Crimson Bolt, who goes after petty criminals wielding nothing but a big ol' wrench. Frank is slightly disturbed, however, and ends up administering indescriminate costumed beatings to people who cut in front of him in line at the movies. Things intensify when Libby (a maniacal and tiny Ellen Page), a clerk at the comic book store where Frank "researches" superheroes without superpowers, figures out who the Crimson Bolt is and signs on as his kid sidekick, Bolty. Bolty derives far, far too much pleasure from hurting people - she's effing nuts. But nuts is sort of what Frank needs when he goes up against Jock and his crew.
The cast Gunn has assembled is impressive: in addition to the aforementioned Wilson, Tyler, Bacon and Page, there's Nathan Fillion as a Christian t.v. superhero, Gregg Henry as a detective, Michael Rooker as Jock's main henchman and Linda Cardellini in a cameo as a pet shop owner. The film itself has a very small, low budget feel to it, not nearly as sophisticated as Slither. It's not as funny either, although there are spots of humor here and there. Wilson's Frank is truly pathetic, good-hearted and also mentally disturbed. The violence is pretty shocking - which I know sounds strange coming from someone who watches so many horror/monster movies. But Super is about a regular person facing real life issues - mental health, drug addiction, abandonment - and to watch him going through the thought process to conclude that violence is the only way he can deal is pretty grim.
Super is the story of sad-sack Frank (Wilson) who, after his recovering addict wife (Liv Tyler) leaves him for a handsome, smarmy drug dealer Jock (Kevin Bacon - excellent and clearly enjoying himself), adopts a superhero alter-ego, The Crimson Bolt, who goes after petty criminals wielding nothing but a big ol' wrench. Frank is slightly disturbed, however, and ends up administering indescriminate costumed beatings to people who cut in front of him in line at the movies. Things intensify when Libby (a maniacal and tiny Ellen Page), a clerk at the comic book store where Frank "researches" superheroes without superpowers, figures out who the Crimson Bolt is and signs on as his kid sidekick, Bolty. Bolty derives far, far too much pleasure from hurting people - she's effing nuts. But nuts is sort of what Frank needs when he goes up against Jock and his crew.
The cast Gunn has assembled is impressive: in addition to the aforementioned Wilson, Tyler, Bacon and Page, there's Nathan Fillion as a Christian t.v. superhero, Gregg Henry as a detective, Michael Rooker as Jock's main henchman and Linda Cardellini in a cameo as a pet shop owner. The film itself has a very small, low budget feel to it, not nearly as sophisticated as Slither. It's not as funny either, although there are spots of humor here and there. Wilson's Frank is truly pathetic, good-hearted and also mentally disturbed. The violence is pretty shocking - which I know sounds strange coming from someone who watches so many horror/monster movies. But Super is about a regular person facing real life issues - mental health, drug addiction, abandonment - and to watch him going through the thought process to conclude that violence is the only way he can deal is pretty grim.
Labels:
movies,
Nathan Fillion,
reviews,
superheroes
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Two books and a movie
I just got the second and third books from Joe Abercrombie's The First Law trilogy from the library, so now I can't do anything else but tear through them because I am obsessed with these books. However, here are snippets about other things I've been reading/watching, in case you're interested.
11/22/63 by Stephen King - Stephen King doesn't need people to review his books anymore. The man is unstoppable and everything he writes is pretty much automatically a best-seller. 11/22/63 is somewhat of a departure for him in that there are no monsters or ghosties or long-legged beasties. It's a fantasy, of course, a time-travel story in which the protagonist goes back in time to stop the Kennedy assassination. I liked it quite a lot (I am not an objective observer, though, as I love SK). He does a particularly nice job with creating the 1958-1963 world and its denizens.
Moneyball - Mr. Mouse has been haranguing me for weeks about getting the movie Moneyball. He read the book and is a baseball fan so, it figures. We finally got the movie and even though it clocks in at over two hours, we both managed to stay awake and engaged. The film's cast is stacked - we were constantly going, "Who's that guy?" "Oh look, it's that guy!" - and Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill do a nice job with their roles, although I'm not so sure I would have nominated Pitt for that Oscar. It was refreshing to see Hill step out of his comfort zone. Also, SPOILER I totally applauded the t.v. when Andy from Parks and Rec hit his homerun.
Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain - I am an introvert who has learned extroverted behaviors for my public persona. Apparently the fact that I abhor going out to lunch and prefer to spend my hour with my nose in a book in the cafeteria has not gone unnoticed; a coworker gave me this book. It's non-fiction (duh) and although it's quite interesting, it's a book that you extroverts should read ... because I already know it all. (Well, not the science-y bits.) Well-written, easy to read. But now that I have more Abercrombie, it's going to have wait for a bit.
11/22/63 by Stephen King - Stephen King doesn't need people to review his books anymore. The man is unstoppable and everything he writes is pretty much automatically a best-seller. 11/22/63 is somewhat of a departure for him in that there are no monsters or ghosties or long-legged beasties. It's a fantasy, of course, a time-travel story in which the protagonist goes back in time to stop the Kennedy assassination. I liked it quite a lot (I am not an objective observer, though, as I love SK). He does a particularly nice job with creating the 1958-1963 world and its denizens.
Moneyball - Mr. Mouse has been haranguing me for weeks about getting the movie Moneyball. He read the book and is a baseball fan so, it figures. We finally got the movie and even though it clocks in at over two hours, we both managed to stay awake and engaged. The film's cast is stacked - we were constantly going, "Who's that guy?" "Oh look, it's that guy!" - and Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill do a nice job with their roles, although I'm not so sure I would have nominated Pitt for that Oscar. It was refreshing to see Hill step out of his comfort zone. Also, SPOILER I totally applauded the t.v. when Andy from Parks and Rec hit his homerun.
Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain - I am an introvert who has learned extroverted behaviors for my public persona. Apparently the fact that I abhor going out to lunch and prefer to spend my hour with my nose in a book in the cafeteria has not gone unnoticed; a coworker gave me this book. It's non-fiction (duh) and although it's quite interesting, it's a book that you extroverts should read ... because I already know it all. (Well, not the science-y bits.) Well-written, easy to read. But now that I have more Abercrombie, it's going to have wait for a bit.
Labels:
book review,
books,
movies
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Mini movie review: Tucker and Dale vs. Evil
I find it oddly synchronous that I would watch Tucker and Dale vs. Evil right after having watched The Cabin in the Woods. They're both horror movies (or, "horror" movies) that put a spin onto the classic horror tropes. TCitW is bigger budget, better acted and smarter; Tucker and Dale is still pretty fun.
There's this bunch of privileged college kids, you see, heading out into the wilds of West Virginia - hillbilly territory - for a weekend of camping, skinny-dipping and hijinks. On the way, they stop at a hole of a gas station which is staffed by a scarcely-toothed hick (at this point I laughed because the movies were right synced up with each other at this point). While the college kids stock up on beer and bug spray, two local yokels are loading up their pick-up truck with all kinds of ominous items: chainsaws, rope, gasoline, chainfalls, pickaxes, hatchets, a wood chipper. These two are the titular Tucker and Dale, played by Alan Tudyk and Tyler Labine respectively, and contrary to appearances and the snap judgments the college kids make, they are very nice fellows. Tucker has just bought a cabin out in the woods - his very own vacation home - and they are headed out there to fix 'er up.
Of course the hillbillies and the college kids cross paths again: Tucker and Dale save one of the girls from drowning and the other kids immediately assume the worst, mounting an attack to rescue their friend. It all goes terribly wrong as the college kids end up impaling themselves on sticks, falling into the wood chipper, shooting themselves in the face, etc., etc., as poor Tucker and Dale watch in bewilderment. There's a moral about judging books by their covers, and one of the college kids turns out to be an actual psycho, and Dale gets both some self esteem and the final girl at the end. It's all silly, foolish, gory fun, and not too long at 86 minutes. A very minor quibble: Alan Tudyk's teeth were WAY too white and straight for him to pull off hillbilly (and his accent kept fading in and out).
There's this bunch of privileged college kids, you see, heading out into the wilds of West Virginia - hillbilly territory - for a weekend of camping, skinny-dipping and hijinks. On the way, they stop at a hole of a gas station which is staffed by a scarcely-toothed hick (at this point I laughed because the movies were right synced up with each other at this point). While the college kids stock up on beer and bug spray, two local yokels are loading up their pick-up truck with all kinds of ominous items: chainsaws, rope, gasoline, chainfalls, pickaxes, hatchets, a wood chipper. These two are the titular Tucker and Dale, played by Alan Tudyk and Tyler Labine respectively, and contrary to appearances and the snap judgments the college kids make, they are very nice fellows. Tucker has just bought a cabin out in the woods - his very own vacation home - and they are headed out there to fix 'er up.
Of course the hillbillies and the college kids cross paths again: Tucker and Dale save one of the girls from drowning and the other kids immediately assume the worst, mounting an attack to rescue their friend. It all goes terribly wrong as the college kids end up impaling themselves on sticks, falling into the wood chipper, shooting themselves in the face, etc., etc., as poor Tucker and Dale watch in bewilderment. There's a moral about judging books by their covers, and one of the college kids turns out to be an actual psycho, and Dale gets both some self esteem and the final girl at the end. It's all silly, foolish, gory fun, and not too long at 86 minutes. A very minor quibble: Alan Tudyk's teeth were WAY too white and straight for him to pull off hillbilly (and his accent kept fading in and out).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


